Democratic presidential candidate Representative Tulsi Gabbard has filed a defamation lawsuit against Hillary Clinton along with claiming that Clinton “carelessly and recklessly impugned” her reputation with “favorite of the Russians” comments and that they’re accountable for “distorting the truth in the middle of a critical Presidential election.”

Tulsi Gabbard is Suing Hillary Clinton for $50 Million in Defamation Lawsuit 2 Tulsi Gabbard

The suit also claims Clinton’s statements caused Gabbard to “lose potential donors and potential voters,” and estimated that the personal and professional damages to her exceed $50 million. It also claimed Gabbard is entitled to “special and punitive damages… in view of Clinton’s malicious and unrepentant conduct” on top of the actual damages.

Karmas a bitch Killary! Hillary holds grudges and most of the criticisms about her are being substantiated. She’s still bitter from 2016 as Gabbard endorsed Beenie and not her probably thinking because she’s a woman shed automatically get that endorsement. Identity politics are insane but Democrats have played that fiddle for generations.

I’m not making any predictions, but I think they’ve got their eye on someone who’s currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate. She’s the favorite of the Russians.

Campaign HQ With David Plouffe back in October comments by Hillary Clinton

One has to think is this a ploy though? Was this cooked up from someone in the progressive wing of the democratic party given the fact that Hillary Clinton’s interview yesterday completely buried Bernie Sanders as a senator and even potential president since he’s the frontrunner in Iowa?

Tulsi Gabbard is Suing Hillary Clinton for $50 Million in Defamation Lawsuit 3 Tulsi Gabbard

At the same time if this is true this was obviously a major win for Gabbard as she’ll get a boost from democratic voters who dislike Clinton and republicans who feel the same way. Moreover, the support within the party is sure to strengthen especially among moderates.

That’s assuming Jill Stein will give it up, which she might not because she’s also a Russian asset. Yeah, she’s a Russian asset—I mean, totally.

Campaign HQ With David Plouffe back in October comments by Hillary Clinton

Now critics of Gabbard and Hillary defenders are coming full force saying that on the podcast Campaign HQ With David Plouffe back in October, Clinton never said Gabbard’s name in relation to the “Russian asset” comments. But wait the Supreme Court has ruled on something very similar dealing with defamatory.

[t]he language used must … be such that persons reading or hearing it will, in light of surrounding circumstances, be able to understand that it refers to the person complaining, and it must have been so understood by at least one other person.

Supreme Court

It may just take a democrat to bring Hillary Clinton down??!

About the Author

Big John

I have an Associates & Bachelors Degree in Criminology with a minor in Political Science. I've been blogging since around 2017, my work has been viewed by 800,000 people, and I am a registered Libertarian. My work has been talked about on many of the largest news outlets in the world from Reuters, USA Today, Politifact, CheckYourFact.com, The Quint and many other outlets.

View All Articles